Affiliate & partner disclosure: This article contains affiliate links, and I may earn a commission if you buy through them at no extra cost to you. As an authorised LifeWave Brand Partner, I have a financial interest in promoting LifeWave products. Testimonial/editorial given by a LifeWave brand partner with financial interest in promoting the product. Full disclosure at the end.
A note before we start. No patch builds muscle or burns fat. This is general information, not medical advice; talk to your doctor before big changes to diet or training.
LifeWave X39 is a non-transdermal, general-wellness phototherapy patch that gently stimulates the skin with light to support the body’s natural energy flow for strength and stamina. X49 is a separate LifeWave general-wellness patch. Neither is a weight-loss product or a treatment for any condition.
“Shred Protocol” is a name some LifeWave users give to wearing the X39 and X49 patches together. The name sounds like a fat-loss product. It isn’t one. Here’s what the combination is, how LifeWave suggests wearing it, and what actually changes body composition.
Key takeaways
- The “Shred Protocol” is X39 and X49 worn together — a user nickname, not a fat-loss claim.
- Body composition is driven by resistance training, protein, calories and recovery.
- Track muscle and fat, not just weight.
- I wear X39 daily; I don’t use X49.
What is it?
X39 is LifeWave’s flagship general-wellness patch. LifeWave positions X49 as a patch for strength, stamina and endurance. Wearing both is the combination. See X39 vs X49 and the X49 patch explained.
How LifeWave suggests wearing them
LifeWave’s common guidance places X39 at the base of the neck and X49 a couple of finger-widths below the navel, on clean, dry skin, for up to 12 hours. Follow the current product instructions; see the patch placement guide.
What actually changes body composition
- Progressive resistance training. The biggest stimulus for building and keeping muscle. I lift every second day using the RP Hypertrophy app.
- Protein. Around 1.6g per kg of bodyweight a day is a common evidence-based target, spread across meals. After 40, anabolic resistance means each meal needs a decent dose.
- Calories. Fat loss needs a modest deficit; no patch changes that.
- Recovery. Sleep, stress and daily movement — I hit 10,000+ steps a day.
I also take 10 PerfectAmino tablets a day (5 fasted, 5 later) and 10g of creatine. BodyHealth’s utilisation claims for PerfectAmino are the company’s own; see my PerfectAmino review.
How to track it
The bathroom scale can’t tell muscle from fat. I scan monthly on a Hume Body Pod and watch the trend in muscle mass and body fat over months.
Get the Simply Younger daily email
One short email a day: the newest post, what I’m testing, and what’s actually working for men over 40.
Join free →Where does X39 fit? As a daily general-wellness extra on top of training, protein and recovery. It is not a body-composition or weight-loss product.
Shop X39 at my LifeWave store →
Frequently asked questions
What is the LifeWave “Shred Protocol”?
A user nickname for wearing X39 and X49 together. It isn’t a fat-loss product.
Will it build muscle or burn fat?
No. Training, protein, calories and recovery do that.
How do you wear them together?
Follow LifeWave’s placement guidance — commonly X39 at the base of the neck and X49 below the navel.
Do you use X49?
No. I wear X39 daily.
Does X39 treat any condition?
No. No such claim is made. X39 is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.
Related reading
X39 vs X49 · Patch Placement Guide · How to Lose Fat Without Losing Muscle After 40 · Anabolic Resistance After 40
Full disclosure. This article is general information, not medical advice. LifeWave patches are general-wellness products and are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease; statements about them have not been evaluated by the FDA. As an authorised LifeWave Brand Partner I have a financial interest in promoting LifeWave products. PerfectAmino and Hume Health links are affiliate links.
Leave a Reply